Les 4-6 décembre prochain auront lieu les 7ème Doctoriales francophones en Sciences sociales de...
Programme du séminaire d’anthropologie diachronique (ethnologie et archéologie) interdisciplinaire...
Concours CNRS Le laboratoire accueille chaque année de nouveaux membres par voie de concours via...
" Du 25 au 27 septembre 2024, le SAGE organise ses 3 journées de rentrée : les PasSAGEs de rentrée...
Retrouvez Morgane Le Boulay et Céline Monicolle dans le magazine Savoir(s) de l'université de...
Titre : La santé des données. Enquête sur un travail hospitalier de production, de contrôle et de...
La famille indivise dans l’Inde contemporaineUne approche démographique et spatiale La soutenance...
Réunis dans le cadre de l’AG extraordinaire du laboratoire SAGE du 12 avril 2024, les membres...
Une programmation ouverte au public : demandez le programme ! Et l'affiche qui annonce les...
Jorunn Møller, David Hall & Romuald Normand (2024) Critical Studies in Education, 1–19
DOI : doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2024.2392609
The meaning of public education is contested. This article aims to understand national policy trajectories of reforming public education and teacher professionalism across three European countries. In this analysis, we will work with Evetts’ and Biesta’s dimensions of professionalism as conceptual tools to trace shifting reconstructions of teacher professionalism and public education. We include an analysis of the national nature of accountability and the status of professional knowledge in education across cases. The following questions are guiding the analysis: (1) What characterizes policy trajectories relating to public education reforms and teacher professionalism across countries? (2) Which convergences and divergences can be identified regarding the interplay between policies about public education reforms and how teacher professionalism is manifested across contexts? (3) What are possible implications of the re-articulation of public education and teacher professionalism in an age of accountability? England, France, and Norway act as cases to illustrate contrasting trajectories in education policy, public administrative traditions and rationales. The analysis shows striking differences between the transformation processes going on as countries have to varying degrees embraced NPM-approaches to educational reforms. We argue that research on public education needs to be examined historically to understand the national status of teacher professionalism.